ArticleSouth African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care2025
Evaluating the implementation of group empowerment for people with type 2 diabetes at Grassy Park Community Day Centre, Cape Town: A convergent mixed-methods study.
Article in South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation strategies for integrating non-communicable disease care into primary healthcare settings in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDiabetes is a major contributor to the burden of disease in South Africa, but glycaemic control is poor. Group empowerment and training (GREAT) for people with type 2 diabetes is a cost-effective intervention in our setting. The aim was to evaluate the implementation of GREAT for diabetes at a primary care facility in Cape Town.
methodsA convergent mixed-method study evaluated implementation outcomes over 6 months. A programme theory model was used to prospectively plan implementation. Semi-structured individual interviews were held with healthcare workers, focus group interviews with patients and sessions were observed to evaluate adoption, feasibility, fidelity and sustainability. Quantitative data evaluated reach, cost and aspects of fidelity. Qualitative data analysis used ATLAS.ti and the framework method. Data were analysed deductively according to the pre-determined implementation outcomes.
resultsKey stakeholders agreed that GREAT was acceptable and appropriate and encouraged adoption. Initial implementation reached 35 patients in four groups and 65% of those invited attended. Only 29% attended all four sessions. Fidelity of the intervention to the training manual was good. Several contextual factors influenced the feasibility of implementation (e.g. support of management, space for group sessions, integration with appointment system, effect on number of walk-in patients, streamlined referral system). Incremental operational costs were trivial (R30/month), while opportunity costs were higher (R26 252/month). Sustainability will be related to ongoing managerial and staff buy-in and adjustment of the implementation strategies to overcome some of the barriers.
conclusionThe study identified 30 determinants of successful implementation outcomes.Contribution: Can guide future implementation in similar contexts as GREAT for diabetes is scaled-up in Cape Town and scaled-out to other provinces in South Africa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.