ArticleEuropean journal of sport science2026
Performance Analysis of 200 m Qualifying Time Trial: Gear Ratios, Velocity Patterns, and Acceleration Strategies.
Article in European journal of sport science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Performance Analysis of 200 m Qualifying Time Trial: Gear Ratios, Velocity Patterns, and Acceleration Strategies.European journal of sport science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aimed to elucidate the relationships between sectional velocity, pedaling rate, and gear ratio with performance outcomes in the 200-m qualifying race in track cycling (200mTT). High-speed video footage (120 Hz) was collected at three Japanese championships in 2024, analyzing 38 male cyclists. Sectional velocities, pedaling rates, and gear ratios were derived from the footage. The track was divided into ten 20-m segments for the timed section; flying-start segments were estimated using visual markers and cubic spline interpolation. Cyclists were categorized into four performance groups based on 200mTT times: top (TG), middle-high (MHG), middle-low (MLG), and low (LG). The TG exhibited significantly higher velocities than other groups from -135 m onward and maintained this advantage throughout the trial (P < 0.05). They also achieved a steady 2% velocity increase during the flying-start phase and demonstrated more consistent pacing with reduced velocity fluctuations across curved and straight segments. Despite comparable gear ratios between TG and MHG, differences in acceleration timing and strategy led to divergent outcomes. Partial correlation analysis controlling for initial velocity confirmed that higher gear ratios independently contributed to greater maximum velocity. In contrast, the magnitude of velocity decrement had minimal influence on race time. These findings underscore the importance of optimizing both technique and conditioning to enhance maximal velocity. The trend toward higher gear ratios highlights the need for earlier well-timed acceleration during the flying-start phase. These insights offer guidance for aligning gear selection and acceleration strategies with cyclists' physical characteristics to improve 200mTT performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.