ArticleGenetic epidemiology2026
Large-Scale Genotype-Based Trait Imputation With Multi-Ancestry GWAS Data.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Large-Scale Genotype-Based Trait Imputation With Multi-Ancestry GWAS Data.Genetic epidemiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been instrumental in identifying genetic variants associated with complex traits and diseases, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, traditional GWAS approaches often focus on European populations, which may lead to loss of power and limit the generalizability of findings across diverse ancestries. On the other hand, LS-Imputation, a nonparametric trait imputation method, leverages GWAS summary statistics and genotype data to impute missing traits, which can then be used for GWAS and other downstream analyses. Although LS-Imputation has been applied successfully to European populations, its performance in non-European populations would be hindered by smaller sample sizes, leading to reduced imputation accuracy. To address these limitations, we propose two novel variants of LS-Imputation-LS-Imputation-Combined and LS-Imputation-Transfer-designed to integrate multi-ancestry GWAS data and enhance imputation performance. LS-Imputation-Combined optimally combines GWAS summary statistics from multiple ancestries, while LS-Imputation-Transfer sequentially refines imputed trait values across ancestries using stochastic gradient descent. We evaluate these methods using data from the UK Biobank and the Alzheimer's Disease Sequencing Project (ADSP), first applying them to high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels as a proof-of-concept before focusing on imputing AD status in Black individuals for genetic association analysis. Our results demonstrate that integrating multi-ancestry GWAS data improves trait imputation accuracy, with LS-Imputation-Transfer achieving the highest performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.