ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Validation and refinement of the AJCC 8th edition ypStage in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy: a large-scale retrospective cohort study.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe AJCC 8th edition post-neoadjuvant pathologic stage (ypStage) shows limited prognostic discrimination in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Alternative strategies have been proposed, but most were limited by small samples and lack of inclusion of patients treated with immunotherapy. This study aimed to validate the AJCC 8th edition ypStage and develop a refined ypStage system with improved prognostic performance for ESCC.
methodsThis was a large retrospective cohort study including 1848 consecutive ESCC patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by esophagectomy between June 2018 and September 2023. Patients were randomly assigned to training (n = 1108) and validation (n = 740) cohorts. A refined ypStage was developed using recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to confirm independent prognostic value. Prognostic performance of the RPA and AJCC 8th edition ypStage systems was compared using the Groome criteria: hazard consistency, hazard discrimination, sample balance, outcome prediction, and overall score. Subgroup analyses were performed by neoadjuvant therapy type.
resultsThe AJCC 8th edition ypStage showed a reversal of the expected survival hierarchy between ypStage II and IIIA [3-year overall survival (OS): II, 80.1%; IIIA, 90.7%]. RPA identified three groups: ypStage I (ypT0-2N0-1), II (ypT0-2N2-3 or ypT3-4bN0-1), and III (ypT3-4bN2-3). In the validation cohort, RPA ypStage demonstrated clear survival separation (3-year OS: I, 91.2%; II, 79.1%; III, 60.5%; pairwise P < 0.01). Multivariable analysis confirmed its independent prognostic value [II vs I: Hazard Ratio (HR) = 2.44, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.68-3.52; III vs I: HR = 3.67, 95% CI: 2.28-5.90; both P < 0.001]. RPA ypStage outperformed AJCC ypStage across all evaluation metrics. Subgroup analyses further supported its robustness, particularly in patients receiving chemotherapy or chemo-immunotherapy.
conclusionThe RPA-derived ypStage provides improved prognostic stratification compared with the AJCC 8th edition in ESCC patients following neoadjuvant therapy. Further external validation is warranted for potential incorporation into future staging guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.