Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41537246›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

GAMMA: gap-aware motif mining under incomplete labeling with applications to MHC motifs.

Xinyi Tang, Ran Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Xinyi TangDepartment of Mathematics, Statistics and Insurance, The Hang Seng University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ran LiuDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Zhuhai 519087, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3627-3994

Funding

Research Funds of Beijing Normal University 312200502537
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationSequence motif identification is crucial for understanding molecular recognition, particularly in immune responses involving peptide binding to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) Class I molecules for antigen presentation to T cells. Traditionally, MHC Class I binding motifs are assumed to be contiguous and span nine amino acids. However, structural evidence suggests that binding may involve nonadjacent residues, challenging the assumptions of existing methods.

resultsIn this study, we propose Gap-Aware Motif Mining Algorithm (GAMMA), a probabilistic framework designed to identify noncontiguous motifs under conditions of incomplete labeling. GAMMA employs Bayesian inference with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling to jointly estimate motif parameters, binding locations, and the relative spacing between binding positions. Through extensive simulations and real-world applications to MHC Class I peptide datasets, GAMMA outperforms existing motif discovery tools such as GLAM2 in accurately localizing binding residues and identifying the underlying motifs. Notably, our results suggest that the true number of binding residues may be eight, fewer than the commonly assumed nine. In addition, for longer peptides, the model captures increased flexibility in the central region, consistent with structural observations that peptides may bulge in the middle. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The raw data and the source codes are available on GitHub (https://github.com/RanLIUaca/GAMMAmotif).

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputational BiologyData MiningHistocompatibility Antigens Class IMajor Histocompatibility ComplexSequence Analysis, ProteinAmino Acid MotifsBayes TheoremBinding SitesImmunoinformaticsMarkov ChainsPeptidesProtein BindingHistocompatibility Antigens Class IPeptides

Identifiers

PMID41537246
PMCPMC12866627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.