Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41537245›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2026

Improving biomedical entity linking with generative relevance feedback.

Darya Shlyk, Lawrence Hunter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Darya ShlykDepartment of Computer Science, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan 20133, Italy.ORCID 0009-0006-4051-6871
Lawrence HunterDepartment of Pediatrics, The University of Chicago, Chicago IL 60637, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-1455-3370

Funding

Chan Zuckerberg Institute DAF2024-350950
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationBiomedical Entity Linking (BEL) maps mentions in biomedical text to standardized identifiers, enabling structured data integration and downstream knowledge discovery. However, current BEL systems remain fundamentally constrained by the recall of the initial candidate pool, where suboptimal retrieval limits the overall effectiveness of the normalization pipeline.

resultsWe present the first systematic evaluation of Generative Relevance Feedback (GRF) for enhancing candidate retrieval in state-of-the-art BEL systems. GRF leverages large language models (LLMs) to enrich the expressiveness of the mention in a zero-shot fashion. We assess GRF's impact under two scenarios-direct linking prediction and candidate generation in cascading normalization pipelines-and analyze its sensitivity to different LLMs, feedback types, and integration strategies. Experiments across eight corpora and four biomedical knowledge bases demonstrate that integrating GRF significantly improves both accuracy and recall, thereby increasing the upper bound on normalization performance. Our findings highlight GRF as an efficient, model-agnostic solution and underscore its potential as a key component for advancing BEL. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The code to reproduce our experiments can be found at: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17853541.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyData MiningFeedbackGenerative Artificial IntelligenceLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID41537245
PMCPMC12866626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.