Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41537170›Full record

Articlenpj urban sustainability2026

Pathways to health: Reporting on health co-benefits from urban climate mitigation action varies by sector.

Blanca Anton, Andy Haines, Rosemary Green, Nienke Meinsma, Tamzin Reynolds, Sarah Whitmee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj urban sustainability, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Blanca AntonDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Andy HainesDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Rosemary GreenDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Nienke MeinsmaInstitute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Tamzin ReynoldsDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Sarah WhitmeeDepartment of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Well-designed city actions to reduce greenhouse gas emissions can also deliver substantial near-term health co-benefits. Improved understanding and reporting of the health benefits from climate mitigation can aid efforts by cities to design and deliver healthy, equitable solutions to the climate crisis. Using global data from the 2022 CDP-ICLEI Track cities questionnaire, we analysed factors that may influence the awareness and identification of health co-benefits from climate mitigation. Actions from the transport and AFOLU sector were five to eight times more likely to report health co-benefits than other sectors, regardless of which region the action was undertaken. There was no significant difference between actions in the pre-implementation stage compared to actions that were underway. The findings highlight the need to raise awareness about the potential health benefits linked to climate mitigation among urban policymakers across all sectors to help deliver an equitable transition to a healthy, net zero future.

Indexed as

Climate-change mitigationEnvironmental impact

Identifiers

PMID41537170
PMCPMC12795749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.