ArticleThe annals of applied statistics2025
KULLBACK-LEIBLER-BASED DISCRETE FAILURE TIME MODELS FOR INTEGRATION OF PUBLISHED PREDICTION MODELS WITH NEW TIME-TO-EVENT DATASET.
Article in The annals of applied statistics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Incorporating external risk information with the Cox model under population heterogeneity: applications to trans-ancestry polygenic hazard scores.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A, (Statistics in Society) · 2026Article
- KULLBACK-LEIBLER-BASED DISCRETE FAILURE TIME MODELS FOR INTEGRATION OF PUBLISHED PREDICTION MODELS WITH NEW TIME-TO-EVENT DATASET.The annals of applied statistics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prediction of time-to-event data often suffers from rare event rates, small sample sizes, high dimensionality, and low signal-to-noise ratios. Incorporating published prediction models from external large-scale studies is expected to improve the performance of prognosis prediction from internal individual-level data. However, existing integration approaches typically assume that the underlying distributions of the external and internal data sources are similar, which is often invalid. To account for challenges, including heterogeneity, data sharing, and privacy constraints, we propose a failure time integration procedure, which utilizes a discrete hazard-based Kullback-Leibler discriminatory information measuring the discrepancy between the external models and the internal dataset. The asymptotic properties and simulation results show the advantage of the proposed method compared to those solely based on internal data. We apply the proposed method to improve prediction performance on a kidney transplant dataset from a local hospital by integrating this small-sized dataset with a published survival model obtained from the national transplant registry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.