ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2026
Japanese Nationwide Prospective Data of Proton Therapy for Liver Metastasis From Pancreatic Cancer.
Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Evidence for the efficacy of proton beam therapy (PBT) for liver metastases of pancreatic cancer remains unclear. Therefore, we analyzed outcomes using data from a multicenter prospective study on particle therapy (PT) by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). Patients and Methods: We enrolled patients who underwent PBT at all facilities in Japan between 2016 and 2019. Patient selection criteria included liver recurrence without recurrence at the primary pancreatic tumor site after curative treatment, no other metastatic tumors in other organs, and up to three liver lesions. Moreover, inoperability and refractoriness to chemotherapy were part of the treatment eligibility criteria. The PBT dose and fractionation corresponded to the JASTRO treatment policy. The local recurrence (LR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors potentially associated with LR and OS were analyzed. Adverse events (AEs) were also investigated. Twenty-four patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 40-82 years) and 40 lesions were enrolled in the study. The median tumor size was 11.7 (0.74-901.2 mL). Seven patients underwent concurrent chemotherapy; meanwhile, the median biological effective dose was 109.6 (range, 88.8-115.2) Gy. Results: The median follow-up period was 9.2 (range, 2.1-41.4) months. The 1-year LR rate was 16.7%. The 1-year OS and PFS rates were 37.5% and 4.2%, respectively, with median survival times of 9.3 and 4.7 months. However, no factors were related to LR. In multivariate analysis, levels of anti-carbohydrate determinant 19-9 ( Conclusion: PBT was safe with few AEs, and patients likely to achieve long-term survival could be identified under appropriate conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.