Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41537097›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of particle therapy2026

Japanese Nationwide Prospective Data of Proton Therapy for Liver Metastasis From Pancreatic Cancer.

Hisashi Yamaguchi, Nobuyoshi Fukumitsu, Haruko Numajiri, Hiroyuki Ogino, Motohisa Suzuki, Takeshi Arimura, Masaru Takagi, Takahiro Waki, Masayuki Araya, Takayuki Hashimoto and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of particle therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hisashi YamaguchiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
Nobuyoshi FukumitsuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Haruko NumajiriDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Hiroyuki OginoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Motohisa SuzukiDepartment of Radiology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan.
Takeshi ArimuraMedipolis Proton Therapy and Research Center, Ibusuki, Kagoshima, Japan.
Masaru TakagiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Sapporo Teishinkai Hospital Proton Therapy Center, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Takahiro WakiDepartment of Radiology, Tsuyama Chuo Hospital, Tsuyama, Okayama, Japan.
Masayuki ArayaProton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan.
Takayuki HashimotoGlobal Center for Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.
Norio KatohDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hokkaido University Faculty of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Evidence for the efficacy of proton beam therapy (PBT) for liver metastases of pancreatic cancer remains unclear. Therefore, we analyzed outcomes using data from a multicenter prospective study on particle therapy (PT) by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO). Patients and Methods: We enrolled patients who underwent PBT at all facilities in Japan between 2016 and 2019. Patient selection criteria included liver recurrence without recurrence at the primary pancreatic tumor site after curative treatment, no other metastatic tumors in other organs, and up to three liver lesions. Moreover, inoperability and refractoriness to chemotherapy were part of the treatment eligibility criteria. The PBT dose and fractionation corresponded to the JASTRO treatment policy. The local recurrence (LR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Factors potentially associated with LR and OS were analyzed. Adverse events (AEs) were also investigated. Twenty-four patients with a median age of 64 years (range, 40-82 years) and 40 lesions were enrolled in the study. The median tumor size was 11.7 (0.74-901.2 mL). Seven patients underwent concurrent chemotherapy; meanwhile, the median biological effective dose was 109.6 (range, 88.8-115.2) Gy. Results: The median follow-up period was 9.2 (range, 2.1-41.4) months. The 1-year LR rate was 16.7%. The 1-year OS and PFS rates were 37.5% and 4.2%, respectively, with median survival times of 9.3 and 4.7 months. However, no factors were related to LR. In multivariate analysis, levels of anti-carbohydrate determinant 19-9 ( Conclusion: PBT was safe with few AEs, and patients likely to achieve long-term survival could be identified under appropriate conditions.

Indexed as

Clinical resultLiver metastasisMulti-institutional cohort studyPancreatic cancerProton beam therapy

Identifiers

PMID41537097
PMCPMC12796604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.