ArticleMaedica2025
Pancreatic Function in Chronic Proton Pump Inhibitor Use: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Maedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for acid-related disorders. Recent evidence suggests potential associations between long-term PPI use and pancreatic dysfunction, though findings remain inconsistent. This study aimed to evaluate pancreatic function in patients on long-term PPI therapy. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital from March 2023 to June 2024. Ninety-seven adults aged 18-65 years who were using PPIs (≥three doses/week for ≥eight weeks) were recruited from outpatient services. Patients with diabetes or those on medications affecting glucose metabolism were excluded. Blood samples were analyzed for C-peptide, amylase, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and random blood sugar (RBS). C-peptide levels were categorized as normal (≤4.20 ng/mL) or abnormal (>4.20 ng/mL). Other biochemical parameters were also similarly classified using standard laboratory cut-offs. Prevalence of dysfunction was expressed as percentages. Associations between C-peptide levels and age, sex, amylase, HbA1c, RBS, PPI type and duration were assessed using odds ratios and Chi-square/Fisher's exact tests. Results: Participants had a mean age of 51.2 years and 62.9% of them were females. The most common PPI was pantoprazole (76.3%). Abnormal C-peptide levels were observed in 10.3% of participants. Raised HbA1c levels were noted in 48.5% of subjects. There were no significant associations with pancreatic function and age, sex, type and duration of PPI treatment. Conclusion: No definitive association between chronic PPI usage and pancreatic dysfunction could be established. A possible association may be suspected due to the high prevalence of raised HbA1c levels in long-term PPI users. Further studies are required to elaborate on these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.