ArticleMaedica2025
Clinical Outcomes of Percutaneous Plantar Fasciotomy in Patients with Refractory Plantar Fasciitis: a Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Maedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Plantar fasciitis is the most common cause of chronic heel pain. Accurate diagnosis is essential, as similar symptoms may arise from other conditions. Surgery is considered after six months of failed conservative treatment, with various techniques available. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of percutaneous plantar fascia release under local anesthesia in patients with plantar fasciitis. Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis - based on clinical and radiological evaluation - who underwent percutaneous plantar fascia release under local anesthesia between 2017 and 2020 in our Outpatient Orthopedic Clinic. Patients with previous foot surgeries, infections, tumours, systemic conditions (rheumatoid arthritis), or bilateral involvement were excluded. All had persistent symptoms for over six months despite conservative treatment. Data collected included demographics, symptom duration, body mass index (BMI), pain characteristics and functional limitations. Outcomes were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS) and subjective patient satisfaction. Statistical analysis was performed using comparisons of means and the Chi-square test. Results: Twenty-three patients (15 women and eight men with a mean age of 50 years, range 39-78) underwent percutaneous plantar fascia release. The mean preoperative VAS score was 8.9 (range: 8-10) for pain, and 8.5 (range: 8-10) for daily activity limitation,. At six months postoperatively, the average VAS score decreased to 1.9 (range: 1-7) for pain and 1.6 (range: 1-6) for activity limitation, based on a telephone survey using the Benton-Weil questionnaire. Two patients (8.7%) reported persistent pain and dissatisfaction. The remaining 21 patients (91.3%) reported satisfactory outcomes. No correlation between spur size and outcomes was found. Statistical analysis showed a significant improvement in both pain and function (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Percutaneous plantar fasciotomy is a safe and effective treatment for plantar fasciitis. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal extent of fascial release and to refine patient selection criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.