ArticleMaedica2025
Radiographic Predictors of Extraction and Impaction Patterns of Third Molars among Adults in Saudi Arabia: a Retrospective Radiographic Study.
Article in Maedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Third molar impaction is a prevalent dental condition with varying clinical presentations across populations. This retrospective study evaluated radiographic predictors and treatment outcomes of third molar impactions among adults in Saudi Arabia. Materials and methods: A total of 791 panoramic radiographs obtained from patients referred to the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery units at Dammam Medical Complex and Riyadh Elm University Hospital between 2018 and 2022 were analyzed. The angulation and level of impaction were assessed using the Pell and Gregory classification system. Statistical analyses, including logistic regression and chi-square tests, were performed to identify significant predictors of extraction. Results: The study cohort had a mean age of 35.3 ± 11.8 years, with females representing 53.1% of cases. Vertical impaction was the most common type (49.3%), followed by mesioangular (27.7%) and horizontal (14.8%). Tooth #48 (mandibular right third molar) was the most frequently extracted (43.7%), followed by tooth #18 (33.3%) and tooth #28 (31.6%). Logistic regression revealed that age 31-45 years, referral for extraction based on radiographic evaluation, impaction of tooth #48, Pell and Gregory Class II and Position B were significant predictors of extraction (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Overall, 36.7% of cases required surgical extraction, whereas 63.3% were managed conservatively with periodic follow-up. These findings underscore the clinical value of early radiographic evaluation and individualized treatment planning to minimize complications associated with third molar impactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.