ArticleMaedica2025
A Cross-Sectional Study on the Prevalence of Metabolic Syndrome among Smokers Versus Non-Smokers.
Article in Maedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Association of cigarette smoking intensity and pack-years with metabolic syndrome: A cross-sectional study.Bioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Metabolic syndrome represented a clustering of abdominal obesity, dysglycaemia, dyslipidaemia and elevated blood pressure that together conferred an increased risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease. The present study consequently examined the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among smokers versus non-smokers and characterised any differences in its constituent components and related risk profiles. Methods: This was a hospital-based comparative cross-sectional study attending general medicine and preventive clinics. Smoking status was assessed by structured interview, while metabolic syndrome was defined based on standard criteria requiring at least three out of five components, consisting of central obesity, raised triglycerides, reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, elevated blood pressure and elevated fasting plasma glucose. Results: Smokers and non-smokers were similar in age, socio-economic status and overall adiposity, but smokers more frequently consumed alcohol and were predominantly male. Compared with non-smokers, smokers had higher mean levels of triglycerides and lower mean high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, while the differences in blood pressure and fasting glucose were smaller and did not reach statistical significance. The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was significantly higher in smokers than non-smokers; smokers more often had three or more clustered components, with higher frequency of raised triglycerides and reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Conclusion: Current smoking was associated with a higher prevalence and greater clustering of metabolic syndrome components compared with non-smoking in this adult outpatient population, driven largely by a more adverse lipid profile and more frequent accumulation of three or more metabolic risk factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.