ReviewMaedica2025
Atypical Polypoid Adenomyoma in a Patient with Hyperprolactinemia: a Novel Case and Systematic Review of the Systematic Reviews.
Review in Maedica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A 34-year-old nulligravid lady was referred to the outpatient gynecology department with the symptoms of abnormal menstrual bleeding and mild anemia. A transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) revealed the presence of a hyperechoic lesion measuring 9.5x4.5 mm in the uterine cavity at the level isthmus (lower uterine segment), suggestive of an endometrial polyp. Consequently, a diagnostic hysteroscopy was performed. Transcervical hysteroscopic resection (TCR) and diagnostic curettage (D&C) were accomplished. A macroscopic analysis of the specimen exhibited a white, pale polypoid formation measuring 1x1 cm with a hard consistency. Histology analysis confirmed the diagnosis of an atypical polypoid adenomyoma (APA). All these findings were explained to the patient and the risk of potential progression to endometrial carcinoma was discussed in detail. A multidisciplinary meeting (MDT) was held and conservative management with levonorgestrel coil insertion or Methoxy progesterone administration per os, along with frequent hysteroscopies every three months, was offered. The patient decided to undergo a hysterectomy with preservation of the ovaries, despite the lack of childbearing. A laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with preservation of adnexa was performed. The pathology analysis confirmed the diagnosis of APA with coexistence of well-differentiated (low-grade) endometrioid carcinoma of the endometrium, stage Ia. Methods: We performed a systematic review of systematic reviews with APA and quality assessment of the included studies. Furthermore, a flow-chart guideline for the management of APA in premenopausal and postmenopausal women is offered. Conclusions: Atypical polypoid adenomyoma is a rare clinical entity. It occurs mainly during the reproductive period of a woman. It is associated with abnormal vaginal bleeding, infertility, nulliparity, obesity, metabolic syndrome, hyperprolactinemia and hyperestrogenism. It is a risk factor for the development of endometrial hyperplasia and subsequent endometrial cancer. Preoperative diagnosis is extremely difficult; there are no specific imaging landmarks in ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment. In patients with a desire for fertility, the management is complicated and should be based on a four-step hysteroscopic transcervical resection of the lesion. Hysterectomy is the right option for post-menopausal women and for women not wishing to conceive.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.