Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41537055›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

A prior-sampling conditional variational autoencoder for neuroimaging normative modelling: Benchmarking deep learning against statistical approaches.

Mai P Ho, Yang Song, Perminder S Sachdev, Lei Fan, Jiyang Jiang, Wei Wen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mai P HoCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2234-9030
Yang SongSchool of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1283-1672
Perminder S SachdevCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9595-3220
Lei FanCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9472-7152
Jiyang JiangCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2147-6302
Wei WenCentre for Healthy Brain Ageing (CHeBA), Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2753-3870

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Normative modelling in neuroimaging provides a powerful framework for quantifying individual deviations from expected brain measures as a function of relevant covariates. While earlier methods focused on analysing distinct variables in isolation, an increasing number of deep learning-based approaches are emerging to handle multiple response variables simultaneously. Conditional variational autoencoders (cVAEs) have previously been applied in this context and show promise for multivariate modelling. However, existing inference methods still face challenges in providing reliable probabilistic predictions, limiting their effectiveness as true normative models. In this study, we propose an enhanced cVAE-based framework that generates predictions directly from covariates through prior-sampling inference. This approach aligns with normative modelling principles while leveraging deep learning to handle high-dimensional data. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach using 195 imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs), including morphometric features (cortical thickness, cortical volume, subcortical volume) and white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volumes, as a test case. Our dataset includes 8,551 normotensive and 18,180 hypertensive participants from the UK Biobank. We benchmarked our model against three well-established normative modelling techniques, including Generalised Additive Models for Location, Scale, and Shape (GAMLSS), Multivariate Fractional Polynomial Regression (MFPR), and Hierarchical Bayesian Regression (HBR), as well as the conventional posterior-sampling cVAE approach employed in existing autoencoder-based normative models. Through comparative analyses, our results show that the proposed cVAE-based framework achieves performance comparable with well-established normative models across various metrics, while appropriately capturing individual deviations associated with hypertension severity. Furthermore, our inference strategy demonstrates superior covariate sensitivity compared with those used in existing cVAE-based normative models, with deviations derived from our method showing better sensitivity to hypertension severity. Beyond predictive performance, our study also offers a comprehensive correlational mapping of the relationships between hypertension and brain structural damage. Taken together, this work highlights the promise of deep learning-based normative modelling for complex datasets such as neuroimaging, paving the way for personalised brain health assessment and early detection of neurological disorders.

Indexed as

conditional variational autoencodersdeep learningnormative modellingprecision psychiatryUK Biobank

Identifiers

PMID41537055
PMCPMC12797146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.