Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41537054›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Cortical processing for the vestibular and visual input of egomotion in macaque monkeys: Separate networks with targeted convergence.

Sarah Marchand, Vanessa De Castro, Elisabeth Excoffier, Marie-Alphée Laurent, Maxime Rosito, Nathalie Vayssière, Benoit R Cottereau, Alexandra Séverac Cauquil, Jean-Baptiste Durand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sarah MarchandCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-5178
Vanessa De CastroCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2932-6330
Elisabeth ExcoffierCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.
Marie-Alphée LaurentCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6585-7257
Maxime RositoCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4712-0897
Nathalie VayssièreCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1897-4773
Benoit R CottereauCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2624-7680
Alexandra Séverac CauquilCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3249-5741
Jean-Baptiste DurandCentre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4780-8691

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of visual and vestibular inputs during egomotion is fundamental for both postural and navigational control. In the present study, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in four macaque monkeys to investigate cortical activation in response to galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS), applied through transmastoid electrodes, and egomotion-compatible (EC) optic flow patterns. Visual and vestibular stimulations activate two largely independent cortical networks: the vestibular network encompasses the insular cortex, superior parietal lobule, frontal lobe, and cingulate cortex, while optic flow primarily activates regions in the superior temporal sulcus, temporo-parietal junction, inferior parietal lobule, and restricted portions of the cingulate and frontal cortices. Despite this segregation, several areas exhibit visuo-vestibular convergence: ventral posterior suprasylvian (VPS) in the temporo-parietal junction, area 7 in the inferior parietal lobule, ventral intraparietal area (VIP) and LIP in the intraparietal sulcus, MSTd in the superior temporal sulcus, CSv in the cingulate sulcus, and FEFsem in the frontal cortex. These findings demonstrate that visual and vestibular signals generated by egomotion are processed in extended and distinct cortical networks with several narrow convergence sites, consistent with the idea that multisensory integration during self-motion is achieved through selective convergence rather than general network overlap.

Indexed as

egomotionfMRIgalvanic vestibular stimulationmultisensory integrationnon-human primateoptic flow

Identifiers

PMID41537054
PMCPMC12797147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.