ArticleAJOG global reports2026
Development and evaluation of an external cephalic version simulation-based educational program.
Article in AJOG global reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFetal malpresentation contributes significantly to cesarean deliveries. External cephalic version (ECV) reduces this risk but requires skilled performance. In low-resource settings, limited training opportunities hinder its use, highlighting the need for effective simulation-based education.
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and evaluate an external cephalic version simulation-based educational program. STUDY
designWe used Kern's 6-step framework to develop a program composed of 6 learning objectives with 6 distinct components specifically for low-resource settings. We conducted a 3-round modified Delphi panel to modify the program. We evaluated the program through a cluster randomized study of obstetrics and gynecology house officers, junior residents, senior residents/fellows, and consultants/attendings in January 2025 at Korle Bu Teaching Hospital in Ghana. Self-reported comfort and confidence, knowledge, skill, and program feasibility and acceptability were analyzed using
resultsThe Delphi panel consisted of 14 experts from 5 countries. At least 80% consensus on all external cephalic version program components was reached before implementation. The learning group's self-reported comfort and confidence (
conclusionOur external cephalic version simulation-based program improves comfort and confidence, knowledge, and skill among Ghanaian clinicians. Given that external cephalic version success depends on the skill of the performing clinician, our program may help increase external cephalic version rates and thus decrease the rates of avoidable cesarean delivery and its complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.