Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41537047›Full record

ArticleAJOG global reports2026

Intimate hygiene practices during pregnancy with demographic and preterm birth associations: a large cohort study.

Josef Alexander Locher, Amy Wise, Renate Strehlau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJOG global reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Josef Alexander LocherDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa (Locher).
Amy WiseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa (Wise).
Renate StrehlauDepartment of Paediatrics and Child Health, VIDA Nkanyezi Research Unit, Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa (Strehlau).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intimate hygiene practices during pregnancy can influence maternal and neonatal health outcomes. Limited data exist on these practices among South African women. This study aimed to characterize intimate hygiene practices among pregnant women in Johannesburg and examine associations with demographic factors and preterm birth. Methods: A secondary analysis was conducted on data from 18,076 pregnant women enrolled in the Group B Streptococcus Correlates of Protection Cohort Study in Johannesburg, South Africa. Participants completed questionnaires detailing their intimate hygiene practices, including frequency, methods, and products used. Statistical analyses assessed the prevalence of these practices, their association with demographic characteristics (age, race, education, occupation, dwelling type, parity, and HIV status), and preterm birth outcomes. Results: The mean age was 28.4 years (range 18-49). Most participants were Black (93.0%), single (80.4%), unemployed (64.7%), and resided in urban areas (70.7%). They reported a median intimate cleaning frequency of 14 times per week (IQR 8-14). Over half (53.3%) practiced douching, and 48.4% added products to their bathwater.Race was significantly associated with adding bathwater products ( Conclusion: Intimate hygiene practices are prevalent among pregnant women in Johannesburg and are significantly associated with various demographic factors. While some associations with preterm birth were identified, no consistent significant association was established, warranting further studies.

Indexed as

douchingintimate hygienematernal healthpregnancypreterm birthSouth Africavaginal microbiome

Identifiers

PMID41537047
PMCPMC12797064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.