Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41537030›Full record

ArticleMalaysian orthopaedic journal2025

Subtalar Arthroereisis as a Reliable Option for Flexible Flatfoot in Children - A Case Series.

F Miraj, Iwam Karda, E A Noor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaysian orthopaedic journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

F MirajDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Iwam KardaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
E A NoorDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Conservative treatment in flexible flat foot (FFF) is preferred in most cases; only in symptomatic and conservative-refractory cases is surgical treatment proposed. Subtalar arthroereisis (STA) is a well-established technique, but there remains a paucity of information surrounding the effectiveness and outcome. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiological and functional outcome of STA in FFF. Material and Methods: This study is a case series of 15ft with symptomatic FFF treated by STA from a period of 2018-2024. Mean age at the time of surgery was 10.1±0.83 years. There was a significant increase in both American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score (AOFAS) and The Oxford Ankle Foot Questionnaire for Children (OxAFQ-C) subjective scoring with p-value of <0.001. Degree of valgus correction was statistically significant (p=0.001). There were significant differences between pre-and post-operative lateral radiographic measurements with p-value of <0.005. One patient with the lowest radiological angle of correction and increased femoral anteversion had loosened implant in two years follow-up. Results: Despite results in earlier studies, recent evidence, including randomised control trials, supports the reliability of STA in managing FFF, advocating its use over traditional osteotomies due to fewer complications and quicker rehabilitation periods. In our study, all subjects had significant improvement in lateral radiographic measurements and subjective scoring evaluation during follow-up. Conclusion: STA is an option for surgical treatment in symptomatic FFF patients. In this study, all presented subjects showed overall satisfying functional and radiological outcome.

Indexed as

case seriesflexible flatfootfunctional outcomeradiologicalsubtalar arthroereisis

Identifiers

PMID41537030
PMCPMC12798132

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.