ArticleEuropean urology open science2026
Robot-assisted Buccal Mucosa Graft Ureteroplasty for Ureteral Stricture: A European Multicenter Case Series.
Article in European urology open science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Preoperative ureteral rest and outcomes of robot-assisted upper urinary tract reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Mapping the global landscape of robot-assisted upper urinary tract reconstruction: a comprehensive bibliometric analysis.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objective: Robot-assisted buccal mucosa graft (BMG) ureteroplasty was introduced a decade ago and has since gained wide adoption within the urology community. However, available data on the outcomes of robot-assisted BMG ureteroplasty remain limited, and no large European series has been published to date. This study aims to report the outcomes of a multicenter European experience with robot-assisted BMG ureteroplasty (RBMGU) for the management of ureteral strictures. Methods: Medical records of all the patients who underwent RBMGU for ureteral strictures at four European centers between 2018 and 2024 were reviewed retrospectively. The primary outcome was the absence of stricture recurrence at the last follow-up, defined as the lack of need for urinary drainage or repeat surgery, or the presence of symptomatic hydronephrosis. Key findings and limitations: A total of 39 patients were included. The median stricture length was 3 cm, with 36% involving the pelvic ureter. A period of ureteral rest was implemented in 85% of patients. Early postoperative complications occurred in eight patients (21%), with only one major event (3%). After a median follow-up of 12 mo, the overall success rate was 87%. No predictive factors for recurrence were identified. Conclusions and clinical implications: RBMGU for ureteral stricture appears to be a feasible and reproducible technique across multiple surgeons and institutions. The outcomes demonstrate a promising trend, with preliminary results indicating low morbidity and recurrence rates. Further studies with larger cohorts are warranted to identify the risk factors for recurrence and to better define the optimal indications for this procedure. Patient summary: In this report, we present the outcomes of robotic ureteral stricture reconstruction using buccal mucosa grafts across four European centers. The results are encouraging, demonstrating low rates of stricture recurrence and postoperative complications. We emphasize the key advantages of robotic-assisted reconstruction and the broad spectrum of ureteral strictures that may benefit from this approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.