Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536946›Full record

ReviewJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2026

From diagnostics to education: Multi-domain evaluation of LLM chatbots in neurology.

Gopi Battineni, Nalini Chintalapudi, Venkata R Dhulipalla, Francesco Amenta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gopi BattineniBiocomputing Developmental Systems Research Group, Department of Computer Science andInformation Systems, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.
Nalini ChintalapudiResearch Department, International Radiomedical Centre (C.I.R.M.), Rome, Italy.
Venkata R DhulipallaResearch Centre of ECE department, Siddhartha Academy of Higher Education, Vijayawada, India.
Francesco AmentaResearch Department, International Radiomedical Centre (C.I.R.M.), Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: The development of large language models (LLMs) has shown promising results in enhancing research processes, data analysis, and communication in various domains of neurology. In this work, we systematically review and synthesize current evidence on the applications of LLMs in the assessment, diagnosis, and monitoring of neurological disorders. Methods: Three databases, namely PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were considered for document search. Article selection was according to PRISMA guidelines, and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the article quality based on relevance, quality, and applicability. Results: Nine studies were included in the final analysis. Based on the findings, LLMs have been utilized in diverse areas of neuroscience including hypothesis generation, clinical decision support, and cognitive modeling. LLMs can process large datasets, identify trends, and support personalized medicine. However, challenges such as interpretability, ethical considerations, and domain-specific training remain critical. Conclusions: By facilitating workflows and uncovering new insights, LLMs can revolutionize different domains of neurology. Nevertheless, further research on their reliability, ethical implications, and adaptation to the unique demands of neuroscience is needed.

Indexed as

ChatGPT4Ethical concernsLarge language modelNeurologySpecialist examinations

Identifiers

PMID41536946
PMCPMC12796919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.