ReviewJournal of Taibah University Medical Sciences2026
Shaping the future of surgery: A scoping review of current robotic practices in KSA.
Review in Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) has transformed surgical practice nationwide. Saudi Arabia (KSA) has integrated RAS into its healthcare system. However, gaps exist in the understanding of its adoption, challenges, and perceptions. This scoping review aims to map the existing literature on RAS in KSA, highlighting its implementation across specialties and identifying barriers to its expansion. Methods: Results: The search identified 3859 studies, 85 were included. Most were case reports (n = 25) and retrospective cohort studies (n = 16), reflecting the recent adoption of RAS in KSA. Most studies originated from the Central region (n = 61), highlighting regional disparities in implementation. Urology (n = 26) was the most represented specialty, followed by general surgery (n = 14), pediatrics (n = 12), and obstetrics/gynecology (n = 10). Robotic partial nephrectomy, robotic donor hepatectomy, and robotic pyeloplasty were the most reported procedures. Ten cross-sectional studies assessed perceptions and knowledge regarding RAS among the general population and healthcare professionals, revealing limited public awareness and misconceptions about complications and robotic errors, and lack of formal training in most healthcare professionals in RAS due to limited system availability and administrative disinterest. Despite these challenges, medical professionals and students expressed a strong interest in RAS training. Conclusion: While RAS is expanding in KSA, significant regional disparities and training gaps remain. expanding education and system availability is crucial for advancement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.