Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536929›Full record

ReviewEuropean heart journal. Imaging methods and practice2026

Patient-centric performance and interpretation of positron emission tomography /computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: a clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the European Society of Cardiology.

Bryan Abadie, Riccardo Liga, Ronny R Buechel, Andreas A Giannopoulos, María Nazarena Pizzi, Albert Roque, Ricardo Geronazzo, Fabien Hyafil, Juhani Knuuti, Antti Saraste and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Bryan AbadieSection of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, J1-5 Main Campus, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0954-1367
Riccardo LigaUniversity of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9964-5604
Ronny R BuechelDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8064-8904
Andreas A GiannopoulosDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Cardiac Imaging, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
María Nazarena PizziUniversity Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-8546
Albert RoqueUniversity Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9738-3850
Ricardo GeronazzoUniversity Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
Fabien HyafilDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, European Hospital Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Juhani KnuutiTurku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Antti SarasteTurku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2488-0893
Riemer H J A SlartDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Paul CremerDepartment of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Richard WeinbergDepartment of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Maria João Vidigal FerreiraInstitute for Nuclear Sciences Applied to Health, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Alessia GimelliImaging Department, Toscana Gabriele Monasterio Foundation, Pisa, Italy.
Wael A JaberSection of Cardiovascular Imaging, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular, and Thoracic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, J1-5 Main Campus, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) is the most advanced myocardial perfusion (MPI) technique for the non-invasive assessment of coronary artery disease and its many manifestations, including ischaemia, hibernation, and scar. This comprehensive overview aims to empower clinicians, technicians, and patients with clear, structured knowledge on performing and interpreting PET MPI. This document will describe stress protocols, patient preparation, tracer pharmacodynamics and nuclear properties, camera capabilities, post-acquisition processing, and a comprehensive and clear reporting system for both perfusion and viability imaging.

Indexed as

cardiac stress testingpositron emission tomography myocardial perfusionviability imaging

Identifiers

PMID41536929
PMCPMC12798802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.