ArticleRheumatology advances in practice2026
Understanding physical activity participation in people living with rheumatoid arthritis.
Article in Rheumatology advances in practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Closing the gaps between science, recommendations and practice of physical activity in rheumatoid arthritis.Rheumatology advances in practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: We examined self-reported physical activity (PA) levels [metabolic equivalents expended (METs)/week and muscle strengthening/resistance activities] in Australians with RA and explored related factors. Methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire assessed whether participants met PA guidelines-defined as >600 METs-min/week of activity and two or more muscle strengthening sessions/week of at least 10 min duration. The questionnaire also collected demographics, RA characteristics including disease activity using the RAPID3 assessment, barriers and support from health professionals. Results were compared between those who did and did not meet the guidelines. Results: Most participants [120/180 (67%)] expended >600 METs/week but only 29% (53/180) participated in muscle strengthening/resistance activities at least twice a week for >10 min at a time. Less than a quarter [43/180 (24%)] were considered to be meeting PA guidelines (i.e. both the METs and muscle strengthening guidelines) and those who did were less likely to have high disease activity as per the RAPID3 Disease Activity Score (4.7% Conclusion: Most people with RA are not meeting full PA guidelines, largely due to low muscle-strengthening activity. Disease activity, confidence and professional support appear to be associated with PA participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.