ArticleImaging science in dentistry2025
Deep learning-based method for estimating age from periapical radiographs of upper incisors in a Thai population.
Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to develop a deep learning model incorporating the pulp-to-tooth area ratio (PTR) for estimating age from periapical radiographs of upper central incisors in a Thai population. Materials and Methods: A total of 2,041 periapical radiographs, representing 3,108 upper central incisors from individuals aged 10.00 to 84.25 years, were analyzed. Root and root canal segmentation masks were generated using Labelbox. The dataset was randomly divided into training (2,175 teeth), validation (466 teeth), and test (467 teeth) sets. Model development proceeded in 3 steps: (1) DeepLabv3+ was trained to segment root and root canal regions. (2) ResNet-50 was trained to estimate age using both segmented images and PTR values derived from the masks. (3) The validation set guided model selection, and the final model was evaluated on the test set using mean absolute error (MAE). Results: The segmentation model (DeepLabv3+) achieved a mean intersection over union (mIoU) of 81.85%. The age estimation model (ResNet-50) yielded an overall MAE of 6.14 years. For age-specific evaluation, test data were grouped into 4 categories: 10-19 years, 20-39 years, 40-59 years, and ≥60 years. The MAE was lowest in the 10-19 years group (3.74 years) and progressively increased with age: 6.07, 6.58, and 8.40 years, respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that integrating deep learning models with PTR measurement offers a promising method for dental radiographic age estimation using a single tooth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.