ArticleImaging science in dentistry2025
Effects of exposure time and voxel size on measured alveolar bone thickness in cone-beam computed tomography: An
Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study assessed the effects of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) voxel size and exposure settings on the accuracy of alveolar bone thickness (BT) measurements. Materials and Methods: Seven pig mandibles were scanned using 6 CBCT settings: 200, 400, and 600 µm voxels, each with an ultra-low dose (ULD) and a standard dose (SD) setting. BT was measured at 3 locations on 1 anterior and 1 posterior tooth. These teeth were then scanned using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), and BT was measured at the same locations. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired Results: The lowest discrepancy between micro-CT and CBCT was observed with the 600 µm ULD (0.29±0.39 mm), followed by the 200 µm SD (0.41±0.72 mm). When BT was less than 2 mm, the lowest discrepancy occurred with the 200 µm SD (0.29±0.33 mm), followed by the 600 µm ULD (0.32±0.25 mm). The ICC between CBCT and micro-CT decreased as BT decreased. RMANOVA indicated no significant effect of CBCT settings on measurement accuracy. Conclusion: BT measured with the 600 µm ULD was comparable to that obtained with the 200 µm SD. The discrepancy between CBCT and micro-CT was notable, especially when BT was less than 2 mm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.