ArticleImaging science in dentistry2025
Influence of increased slice thickness and sharpening filter application in the detection of bone graft loss around implants.
Article in Imaging science in dentistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study investigated the effect of increasing slice thickness and applying sharpening filters on the diagnosis of bone graft loss in regions adjacent to zirconia implants using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Materials and Methods: Twelve zirconia implants were inserted into mandibles, followed by bone graft application. Graft loss was then simulated in half of the samples. CBCT scans were obtained using 2 devices (OP300 and Eagle 3D) with parameters set at 90 kVp, 8 mA, and a 133 µm voxel size. Five examiners assessed the scans under different conditions: original thickness, 1 mm, 2 mm, no filter, Sharpen 1×, and Sharpen 2×. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated and compared using 2-way analysis of variance (α=5%). Results: For the OP300 device, increasing slice thickness to 1 mm impaired AUC, sensitivity, and specificity metrics ( Conclusion: For 1 device, a 1 mm increase in slice thickness impaired the diagnosis of bone graft loss in areas adjacent to zirconia implants. However, the application of sharpening filters helped mitigate this impairment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.