Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536875›Full record

ArticleRadiology case reports2026

Two cases of uterine metastasis from breast cancer: Radiologic-pathologic correlation and literature review.

Go Nakai, Takashi Yamada, Tomohito Tanaka, Kazuhiro Yamamoto, Keigo Osuga

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Go NakaiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka 569-8686, Japan.
Takashi YamadaDepartment of Pathology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka 569-8686, Japan.
Tomohito TanakaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka 569-8686, Japan.
Kazuhiro YamamotoDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka 569-8686, Japan.
Keigo OsugaDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University, 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki City, Osaka 569-8686, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine metastasis from breast cancer is extremely rare and often misdiagnosed as primary uterine neoplasm due to nonspecific imaging features. We present 2 cases illustrating the radiologic-pathologic correlation of uterine metastases. Patient 1 was an 81-year-old woman with a history of invasive ductal carcinoma. Pelvic Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a well-circumscribed uterine mass with intermediate signal intensity (SI) on T2-weighted images (T2WI), high SI on diffusion-weighted images (DWI), and minimal contrast enhancement. Patient 2 was a 67-year-old woman with prior invasive lobular carcinoma, presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding 18 years after initial treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a lobulated mass in the posterior uterine wall showing heterogeneous T2 SI and high SI on DWI, resembling a degenerative leiomyoma. In both cases, the myometrium was diffusely thickened, with low to mildly high SI on T2-weighted images (T2WI) and mildly high SI on DWI. No discrete lesions were observed in the cervix on imaging. Radiologic-pathologic correlation confirmed metastatic involvement of the uterus, including the cervix, either diffusely or focally. MR findings may be influenced by the stromal composition of metastatic lesions and by the morphologic diversity of metastases-features that parallel those seen in primary breast cancer. Because metastatic lesions may mimic leiomyomas or remain occult, diagnosis should not rely on T2 SI alone. Rather, the combination of multiplicity, DWI hyperintensity, and clinical history should be considered. Clinicians should maintain a low threshold for endometrial biopsy in conjunction with serum tumor marker assessment during the diagnostic evaluation of uterine lesions.

Indexed as

Breast cancerMRIPETRadiologic-pathologic correlationUterine metastasis

Identifiers

PMID41536875
PMCPMC12795663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.