ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2026
The impact of Susan G. Komen-funded research on approved drugs for breast cancer treatment.
Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Susan G. Komen® (Komen) has invested nearly $1.1 billion in ground-breaking breast cancer research since 1982. As a patient-centered organization, Komen measures research funding impact beyond academic metrics in favor of economic value and societal effects. Here, we highlight an innovative approach to assessing the real-world impact of Komen-funded research by showing how Komen funding for pivotal studies and key personnel conducting research contributed to discovery and development of targeted therapy drugs approved to treat breast cancer by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) between 2012 and 2023. Methods: We utilized bibliometric analysis to work backwards through citations within pivotal Phase III clinical trial publications to identify earlier clinical trials, pre-clinical research, and basic research publications that supported development of each drug, evaluating each published study and contributing authors for Komen funding support. Results: All 19 targeted therapy drugs approved by the FDA between 2012 and 2023 were impacted at multiple phases along the drug development pipeline by Komen funding, including direct impacts in basic research (i.e., investments in projects) that supported target discovery, and impacts in support of key personnel who contributed to pivotal studies and clinical trials (i.e., investments in people) that led to approval. Conclusions: Nonprofit and public sector research funding provide the foundation for the drug development pipeline. This paper highlights an innovative approach to assess the impact of research investments beyond traditional academic measures and underscores the significance of nonprofit, patient-centered organizations like Komen in driving drug development through supporting basic and applied research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.