Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536754›Full record

ArticleThe journal of advanced prosthodontics2025

Evaluation of relative deviations in virtual articulators for simulating occlusal contacts at increased vertical dimensions.

Elvan Biren, Sina Saygılı, Berk Bilgen, Tonguç Sülün

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elvan BirenDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3255-8732
Sina SaygılıDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9411-0507
Berk BilgenDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3102-0632
Tonguç SülünDepartment of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5518-7915

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate planning for occlusal vertical dimension (OVD) increase is crucial for prosthodontic success. This study evaluates the effects of different OVD increase amounts (2 mm or 5 mm), methods (articulator-based or intraoral) and virtual facebow use on occlusal contacts. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty-one individuals were initially recruited; three dropped out, leaving 18 participants. Digital impressions, bite records in maximum intercuspal position (MIP) and facial scans were obtained. Each participant received eight occlusal splints, varying by OVD increase method, amount and facebow use. Centric relation contacts and MIP were recorded using articulator paper and a scannable bite material. These scans were superimposed with Group D (2 mm intraoral increase without facebow) serving as the reference baseline. Deviations in the X (lateral), Y (anteroposterior) and Z (superoinferior) directions were analyzed using non-parametric tests with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons.

resultsNo significant deviations were observed in the X-direction. However, significant deviations occurred in the Y and Z-directions in certain groups, particularly with a 5 mm intraoral increase. Effect size analysis indicated that most Y-direction differences were minor, whereas Z-direction deviations at higher OVD increases were more clinically relevant.

conclusionRegardless of the method, increasing the OVD by 2 or 5 mm and using a virtual facebow did not significantly affect the number of occlusal contacts. However, spatial deviations of contacts were detected, with articulator-based 5 mm increase producing fewer deviations than intraoral methods. Within the limitations of this study, the virtual facebow did not substantially reduce deviations.

Indexed as

Occlusal vertical dimensionOcclusionVirtual articulatorVirtual facebow

Identifiers

PMID41536754
PMCPMC12798328

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.