ArticleThe journal of advanced prosthodontics2025
Evaluation of relative deviations in virtual articulators for simulating occlusal contacts at increased vertical dimensions.
Article in The journal of advanced prosthodontics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeAccurate planning for occlusal vertical dimension (OVD) increase is crucial for prosthodontic success. This study evaluates the effects of different OVD increase amounts (2 mm or 5 mm), methods (articulator-based or intraoral) and virtual facebow use on occlusal contacts. MATERIALS AND
methodsTwenty-one individuals were initially recruited; three dropped out, leaving 18 participants. Digital impressions, bite records in maximum intercuspal position (MIP) and facial scans were obtained. Each participant received eight occlusal splints, varying by OVD increase method, amount and facebow use. Centric relation contacts and MIP were recorded using articulator paper and a scannable bite material. These scans were superimposed with Group D (2 mm intraoral increase without facebow) serving as the reference baseline. Deviations in the X (lateral), Y (anteroposterior) and Z (superoinferior) directions were analyzed using non-parametric tests with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons.
resultsNo significant deviations were observed in the X-direction. However, significant deviations occurred in the Y and Z-directions in certain groups, particularly with a 5 mm intraoral increase. Effect size analysis indicated that most Y-direction differences were minor, whereas Z-direction deviations at higher OVD increases were more clinically relevant.
conclusionRegardless of the method, increasing the OVD by 2 or 5 mm and using a virtual facebow did not significantly affect the number of occlusal contacts. However, spatial deviations of contacts were detected, with articulator-based 5 mm increase producing fewer deviations than intraoral methods. Within the limitations of this study, the virtual facebow did not substantially reduce deviations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.