Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536730›Full record

ArticleHealth and human rights2025

Regression of Hard-Won Advances in Socialized Medicine: The Emergence of the Private Sector in Health Care in Serbia.

Milutin Kostić, Danilo Vuković

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and human rights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Milutin KostićAssociate professor in the Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Serbia.
Danilo VukovićFull professor in the Faculty of Law, University of Belgrade, Serbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dual practice physicians are those who work in both the public and private sectors: for example, in the morning seeing patients in a state-run hospital, and in the afternoon seeing paying customers in a private facility. Dual practice is a legal but morally problematic practice that can lead to dual loyalty. In Serbia, dual practice has contributed to institutional corruption because physicians who work in both sectors siphon patients from public facilities into private ones and have little incentive to protect the public system. This problem is especially acute in the areas of psychiatry and the public mental health care sector. Private health care is unregulated, with no legal framework for psychotherapy, and there is widespread reliance on cheap anti-anxiety drugs in the population. All of this contributes to rising health care costs, poorer care in both the private and public sectors, overworked physicians, and the shortsighted complicity of the guilds. This is an attack on the right to health: the poor will often get insufficient care, while the patients who are financially better off are at risk of overtreatment and overdiagnosis.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CarePhysiciansPrivate SectorHumansPublic SectorSerbia

Identifiers

PMID41536730
PMCPMC12799034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.