Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536725›Full record

ArticleHealth and human rights2025

Chasing Accountability in Global Health: Reflections from Experience on the UN Secretary-General's Independent Accountability Panel on Women's, Children's, and Adolescents' Health.

Alicia Ely Yamin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and human rights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alicia Ely YaminLecturer on law and director of the Global Health and Rights Project at the Petrie-Flom Center, Harvard Law School, and adjunct senior lecturer on health policy and management at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The story of United Nations (UN) efforts to create an independent mechanism to foster greater accountability across global health is one of high hopes, missed opportunities and, ultimately, planned project failure. The creation of the UN Secretary-General's Independent Accountability Panel on Women's, Children's and Adolescents' Health (IAP) in 2016 was born out of the idea that accountability was the missing link to achieve progress on the Sustainable Development Goals related to women's, children's, and adolescents' health. The IAP produced four reports before it was dissolved in 2020. Subsequently, other independent accountability mechanisms have been proposed, such as for antimicrobial resistance. In this paper, I draw on my experience as a member of the IAP to examine the context for the creation of the IAP and share four lessons as to why meaningful accountability has been so elusive in global health and how future efforts might benefit from these insights. These lessons relate to the need for (1) normative grounding; (2) institutional legitimacy; (3) genuine independence; and (4) conceptual clarity with respect to the meaning of accountability. I conclude by arguing that the deeply neoliberal and colonial architecture of global governance for health constrains possibilities for transformative accountability. In telling this story, I do not pretend to represent the views of other IAP members, who may have very different reflections.

Indexed as

Adolescent HealthChild HealthGlobal HealthSocial ResponsibilityUnited NationsWomen's HealthAdolescentChildFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID41536725
PMCPMC12799031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.