Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536704›Full record

ArticleHealth and human rights2025

Accountability Beyond Blame: Rethinking Maternal Death Surveillance and Response.

Mulu Beyene Kidanemariam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and human rights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mulu Beyene KidanemariamPhD candidate at the Faculty of Law and a researcher at the Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Maternal death reviews or audits are among several interventions used to reduce maternal mortality. The maternal death surveillance and response (MDSR) system is one such mechanism, combining case identification with analysis of underlying causes to inform corrective action. Although introduced to generate information for accountability in maternal health, the meaning and implications of accountability in this context remain underexamined. A dominant framing of MDSR as an internal quality assurance tool-coupled with a narrow, punitive conception of accountability-appears to limit its potential to help address preventable maternal deaths. This paper draws on the stated objectives and structural design of MDSR to argue that reconceptualizing it as a mechanism of human rights accountability not only aligns with its normative aims but also provides a more robust framework for tackling maternal mortality. It responds to the challenge of achieving accountability without reducing it to blame, examining how MDSR can foster accountability consistent with international human rights standards and what this would entail in practice.

Indexed as

Human RightsMaternal DeathMaternal MortalityPopulation SurveillanceSocial ResponsibilityFemaleHumansPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41536704
PMCPMC12799024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.