Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536701›Full record

ArticleHealth and human rights2025

No Place to Park the Clinic: Accountability, Expropriation, and the Social Function of Property in Pursuit of Health Equity in South Africa.

Lindani Mhlanga, Tamanda Kamwendo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and human rights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lindani MhlangaPostdoctoral researcher at the Free State Centre for Human Rights, University of the Free State, South Africa.
Tamanda KamwendoSenior lecturer in the Department of Private Law, Faculty of Law, University of the Free State, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As South Africa moves toward implementing the National Health Insurance scheme, the promise of universal health coverage remains constrained by material and legal obstacles to land access. Mobile clinics, vital for underserved communities, are undermined by tenure insecurity, fragmented land governance, and exclusionary property regimes. These obstacles expose an accountability gap: the state's failure to use available constitutional tools to dismantle entrenched spatial inequalities. This paper conceptualizes accountability through three interlinked features-monitoring, review against human rights standards, and remedial action-and uses this framework to examine the case of South Africa. We argue that equitable health care delivery requires transforming the property relations that structure spatial access. At the heart of this claim is the recognition that property is a social institution whose legitimacy depends on serving broad societal goals. Reframed in this way and coupled with expropriation as a constitutionally sanctioned remedial tool, land acquisition for health care infrastructure becomes a decisive test of accountability. Doing so repositions expropriation not as an exception but as a necessary instrument of social repair and redistributive justice, particularly where historical dispossession and spatial apartheid have left deep scars in access to health care.

Indexed as

Health EquityHealth Services AccessibilitySocial ResponsibilityHuman RightsHumansSocial JusticeSouth AfricaUniversal Health Insurance

Identifiers

PMID41536701
PMCPMC12799030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.