Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536695›Full record

ArticleHealth and human rights2025

Institutional Corruption in the Political Economy of Global Mental Health: Challenges for Transformative Human Rights Praxis.

Alicia Ely Yamin, Camila Gianella Malca

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health and human rights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alicia Ely YaminLecturer on law and director of the Global Health and Rights Project at the Petrie-Flom Center, Harvard Law School, and adjunct senior lecturer on health policy and management at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, United States.
Camila Gianella MalcaAssociate professor in the Department of Social Sciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Lima, Peru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through an exploration of the impacts of institutional corruption in global mental health, we argue here that deploying human rights-based approaches to health must go beyond rhetoric regarding equity in access to treatment to address power structures that systematically perpetuate harm against diverse people in specific contexts. First, applying human rights to mental health in transformative ways requires upending the biomedical paradigm that both locates mental health within people's brains and imbues psychiatric expertise as an unchallengeable authority in defining mental health conditions. Second, such change in approaches to mental health has proved challenging due in significant measure to institutional corruption, defined as a systemic, legal influence that diverts the institution from its purpose. We focus on institutional corruption driven by financial influences of the pharmaceutical industry in combination with the guild interests of the psychiatric profession. Third, we sketch the relation between institutional corruption and the spread of neoliberal policy imperatives on the financing and organization of mental health services in lower-middle and middle-income countries. Finally, we question the metrics deployed in global health that reaffirm existing presumptions in mental health systems, such as coverage, which can foster institutionalized corruption. We conclude that focusing on institutional corruption allows us to understand the need for new forms of health governance aligned with transformative human rights praxis.

Indexed as

Global HealthHuman RightsMental HealthMental Health ServicesPoliticsDeveloping CountriesDrug IndustryHumans

Identifiers

PMID41536695
PMCPMC12799047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.