ArticleSichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition2025
[Clinical Study of Different Doses of Glucocorticoids in the Treatment of Severe
Article in Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunopathogenesis, molecular phenotyping, and host-directed interventions for severe pediatricFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Comparison of Different Corticosteroid Regimens for RefractoryInfection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Prediction models for refractoryFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics of children with severe Methods: Clinical data from 271 children who were hospitalized at Tianjin Children's Hospital between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022, and who received GC treatment for SMPP were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into low-dose (methylprednisolone ≤ 2 mg/[kg·d]) and high-dose (methylprednisolone > 2 mg/[kg·d]) groups. A 1∶1 PSM based on the matching variables, including time from onset to admission, time from fever onset to GC administration, and time from GC administration to follow-up chest X-ray, was performed to reduce confounding factors, resulting in 90 matched pairs in total in the low-dose and high-dose groups. Clinical characteristics were compared between the two groups after PSM. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for high-dose GC use. The 90 pairs of children were further divided into an ineffective group ( Results: Children in the high-dose group were younger and had higher platelet counts and a higher incidence of atelectasis (all Conclusion: High-dose GC therapy may facilitate fever resolution, shorten the duration of fever, and enhance radiological improvement. However, its overall efficacy is not significantly superior to low-dose therapy and is associated with a higher incidence of adverse reactions. Younger age, atelectasis, and elevated platelet count are key factors influencing the use of high-dose GC in children. Notably, RMPP and high peak fever are independent risk factors for GC treatment failure, irrespective of the GC dosage. Clinicians should carefully evaluate the individualized risk-benefit profile when considering high-dose GC therapy for pediatric SMPP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.