Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536626›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Artificial Intelligence for Hospital Scheduling: A Simple, Reproducible, and Effective Model.

Corentin Biot, Tressy Tabbuso, Yoann Marechal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Corentin BiotPediatrics, CHU (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire) Charleroi-Chimay, Charleroi, BEL.
Tressy TabbusoPediatrics, CHU (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire) Charleroi-Chimay, Charleroi, BEL.
Yoann MarechalNeonatology, CHU (Centre Hospitalier Universitaire) Charleroi-Chimay, Charleroi, BEL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hospital scheduling, particularly for on-call shifts and daily assignments, is a complex task that must account for numerous factors, such as service requirements, staff preferences, and unplanned absences. Traditional methods often result in significant administrative burden and can lead to staff frustration, potentially affecting the quality of care. This study explores the use of artificial intelligence-based large language models (AI LLMs) to automate hospital scheduling through widely accessible tools, aiming to simplify the process, reduce manual effort, and enhance fairness. ChatGPT

Indexed as

artificial intelligence in medicinechat gptemergency medicineexcelpediatricsscheduling

Identifiers

PMID41536626
PMCPMC12796984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.