ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2026
Botulism Sequelae: A Systematic Review.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Botulism is a life-threatening neuroparalytic disease caused by botulinum neurotoxins. While its acute phase has been extensively studied, long-term sequelae following recovery remain insufficiently explored. This systematic review aims to comprehensively assess and synthesize available evidence on post-botulism sequelae to improve understanding and guide future research. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE via Ovid, and Web of Science from inception to 24 June 2024. Eligible studies included observational studies, case series, and case reports describing post-recovery symptoms in individuals diagnosed with foodborne, wound, or infant botulism, excluding iatrogenic cases. The risk of bias was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklists. Results: Out of 340 screened records, 9 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 2 case-control studies ( Conclusions: This systematic review highlights significant long-term sequelae among botulism survivors, particularly fatigue, respiratory impairment, and psychosocial dysfunction. While recovery trajectories suggest improvement over time, persistent symptoms may impact quality of life. Standardized outcome measures and longitudinal studies are needed to elucidate the burden of post-botulism sequelae further and inform clinical management strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.