Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536537›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

The effect of video observation on the frequency, type, and accuracy of peer feedback in a long jump learning context.

Hiba Abdelkafi, Ahmed Ghorbel, Mohamed Yaakoubi, Mohamed Moncef Kammoun, Mohammed Issa Alsaeed, Adnene Gharbi, Omar Trabelsi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hiba AbdelkafiDepartment of Education Sciences, The High Institute of Applied Studies in Humanities of Mahdia, University of Monastir, Mahdia, Tunisia.
Ahmed GhorbelResearch Unit: Physical Activity, Sport and Health, UR18JS01, National Observatory of Sport, Tunis, Tunisia.
Mohamed YaakoubiResearch Unit: Physical Activity, Sport and Health, UR18JS01, National Observatory of Sport, Tunis, Tunisia.
Mohamed Moncef KammounThe High Institute of Sport and Physical Education, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Mohammed Issa AlsaeedDepartment of Biomechanics & Motor Behavior, College of Sport Science & Physical Activity, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Adnene Gharbi *Research Unit: Physical Activity, Sport and Health, UR18JS01, National Observatory of Sport, Tunis, Tunisia.
Omar Trabelsi *Department of Education Sciences, The High Institute of Applied Studies in Humanities of Mahdia, University of Monastir, Mahdia, Tunisia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Video technology facilitates feedback provision in sport pedagogy, benefiting both teacher/coach and peer feedback. Most studies focus on attributing learning gains to video-based peer feedback, but none examine how the dynamics of feedback itself change to mediate the effects of video observation (VO) on learning outcomes. Objectives: This study compares the frequency, type, and accuracy of peer feedback based on direct observation (DO) and VO in a long jump learning context. Methods: Forty-one sports science students ( Results: Video observation significantly increased the overall frequency of feedback (median: 5 vs. 3, mean: 5.3 vs. 2.9, Conclusion: These findings help explain the well-documented effects of video-based peer feedback in sport pedagogy. VO empowers learners to engage more socially and focus more on providing prescriptive and accurate feedback, as the video itself provides descriptive information to the performer and a more detailed, controlled observation for the observer.

Indexed as

cooperative learninglong jumpmultimedia-based learningsport pedagogyvideo-based feedback

Identifiers

PMID41536537
PMCPMC12796952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.