Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536488›Full record

ArticleDelaware journal of public health2025

Historical Claims Literature Review Paper: Black Maternal Health.

Jasmine R Hilliard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Delaware journal of public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Jasmine R HilliardDepartment of Social Work, Delaware State University.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mistrust among Black women toward the medical system is evident across many eras of reproductive history, and the generational mistreatment of their reproductive health continues to harm their mental well-being and family health in the 21st century. Even with the advancement of modern medicine, Black women and babies are dying at a higher rate than other ethnic groups. Medicine has long been used to stereotype Black women's physical and emotional resilience, sexuality, and capacity for motherhood. The interplay of race, socioeconomic power, and institutional knowledge has worked to preserve an inequitable and oppressive framework governing Black women's reproductive rights. This article reviews literature on the history of reproduction as it relates to Black women, as well as studies examining culturally sensitive approaches aimed at improving provider-patient interactions and reducing maternal and infant mortality. The results indicate that historical constructions of race and the persistence of racial stereotypes continue to shape the practices of today's medical professionals. By understanding how these stereotypes developed and how they intersect with race and socioeconomic status, we can foster new frameworks that improve outcomes for Black women and their families.

Identifiers

PMID41536488
PMCPMC12798944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.