Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536417›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2026

The potential of unstructured "physical activity" data for understanding relationships between movement-induced joint loading and osteoarthritis progression.

Peter Schaefer, Zoe Struk, Kerry E Costello

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Peter SchaeferMechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, FL, USA.
Zoe StrukMechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, FL, USA.
Kerry E CostelloMechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, FL, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gait and exercise have been extensively studied in knee osteoarthritis (OA) as potential interventions to modify mechanical loading at the joint and, subsequently, influence biological processes and disease progression. However, this research has often failed to account for mechanical loading encountered in daily life outside structured activities. Wearable sensors help address this limitation by capturing movement as it occurs in daily life. Yet most analyses have relied on coarse summary measures (e.g., step count), overlooking biologically relevant variation in loading patterns across activities and time. Given that these sensors record millions of data points per day, there is an opportunity to move beyond summary measures and quantify within- and between-day variations in movement patterns. We propose that a deeper exploration of these rich datasets, guided by OA literature and related fields, may reveal how load-inducing human movement contributes to knee OA, informing the development of personalized, activity-based interventions.

Indexed as

Activity variabilityBiomechanicsData scienceDigital healthReal-world movementWearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID41536417
PMCPMC12796104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.