ReviewCureus2025
Systematic Review of Therapeutic Strategies for Reducing Parkinson's Disease Symptoms and Progression.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by motor and non-motor symptoms, including cognitive decline, which plays a significant role in its pathogenesis. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic strategies in reducing symptoms and potentially slowing the progression of PD. This systematic review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. A systematic search was conducted across PubMed, MEDLINE, Europe PMC, EBSCO Open Dissertations, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 2015 and January 2025. Inclusion criteria focused on RCTs assessing therapeutic interventions aimed at slowing Parkinsonian symptoms and disease progression compared to placebo or standard care. Study quality was appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 (RoB-2) tool. The review identified 15 RCTs that met the inclusion criteria. Interventions, such as exenatide and apomorphine, demonstrated improvements in motor symptoms, as measured by the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS), often coupled with reductions in inflammatory markers like high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP). However, cognitive interventions yielded mixed results, showing benefits only in specific cognitive domains. The safety profiles varied significantly; for example, apomorphine (93% adverse events) exhibited substantially higher rates of adverse events compared to the placebo group (57%). Therapeutic strategies aimed at targeting PD symptoms show promise in managing both motor and non-motor manifestations of the disease. While benefits for cognitive decline are less consistent, these interventions warrant further investigation for their potential to slow overall disease progression. Future research should prioritize larger, multicenter RCTs with longer follow-up, explore combination therapies, and focus on identifying biomarkers for personalized treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.