ArticleCureus2025
Print, Play, and Learn: Cataloging Card and Board Games for Medical Education From 1980 to 2025.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- To the Editor: Sharing the Full Game Enhances Replicability and Impact of Studies of Card and Board Games in Health Professions Education.Journal of graduate medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Card and board games are increasingly described in the medical education literature, but games in the literature are not always available for use by educators. Since the last survey of games for medical education, new funding and distribution technologies have reduced barriers to sharing games, and we hypothesize that more games are available than described in the literature and that new technologies have contributed to this availability. We aim to describe the current landscape of games beyond the literature to facilitate their use and study. Methods For this study, we curated a list of sites where games are available for download and/or purchase by searching for sites associated with the games from an earlier review. We searched these sites over a three-year period to build a catalog of games published in or before 2024 that were designed for physicians and/or physician-track learners. We described the audiences, content areas, technologies used for distribution, and other details about the games. Results We identified 224 games, of which 87 met the inclusion criteria. The number of games increased year-over-year from 2013-2019, and the peak year was 2023. Popular game topics included infectious disease (n=15), anatomy (n=11), neurology (n=10), pediatrics (n=10), and emergency medicine (n=9). Games were often shared using printable files (34) and print-on-demand services (23). Only 31 (36%) games had an associated academic publication. Conclusions The number of medical education games has substantially increased in the last decade, facilitated by the adoption of print-on-demand and the sharing of printable files. Gaps in content area and target audience still remain, and we encourage educators to employ funding and distribution technologies to facilitate sharing games more widely.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.