ArticleCureus2025
Evaluating Research Preparedness and Skill Gaps Among Osteopathic Medical Students Pursuing Surgical Specialties.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives The objective of this study is to evaluate osteopathic medical students' self-reported research experiences, skill levels, and professional goals. This study specifically aimed to assess how students perceive their readiness to engage in research, explore the barriers they face in translating motivation into scholarly productivity, and identify which research tasks students feel most and least confident performing. These findings aim to clarify the disconnect between strong research motivation and limited output and to inform future efforts to improve research engagement among osteopathic students pursuing surgical careers. Methods A national, cross-sectional survey was administered to osteopathic medical students interested in surgical specialties. The survey assessed demographic characteristics, prior research experience, confidence in research skills, and future research goals. Responses were stratified by confidence in research, and associations between prior research activity and confidence in specific research skills were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage test for trend. Results Among 75 respondents, 86.7% had never coauthored a peer-reviewed publication, and 70.7% had never published as a first author. Despite this, students with prior poster presentations reported high confidence in designing and executing research (83.3%), preparing manuscripts (92.6%), presenting research (81.5%), and teaching research fundamentals (90.9%) (p < 0.05). Podium presentations were associated with high confidence in designing research (55.6%), preparing manuscripts (60.9%), presenting (51.9%), and teaching (54.5%). Coauthor publications were associated with confidence in designing research (69.4%), manuscript preparation (70.7%), and teaching (63.6%), while first-author publications were associated with confidence in the same domains (38.9%, 41.5%, and 42.4%, respectively). Quickshot presentations were associated only with manuscript preparation (41.5%) (p < 0.05). Conclusions Osteopathic medical students interested in surgical specialties report confidence and motivation to participate in research but lack prior research presentations and publications, as well as statistical and data analysis skills. These findings highlight the need for structured research support, mentorship, and training in research methodology and analysis. To address these needs, national research program initiatives have been developed to provide osteopathic students with access to surgical research opportunities, mentorship, and skill-building resources. Such initiatives may help bridge the gap between student motivations and research productivity, improving equity and competitiveness in the residency selection process.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.