Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41536369›Full record

ArticleCureus2025

Radiation Exposure and Surgeon Safety During Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Absence of Neuronavigation: A UK Single-Centre Retrospective Study.

Azam A Baig, Evangelos N Anagnostou, Katlyn Green, Alexandru Budu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Azam A BaigDepartment of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Evangelos N AnagnostouDepartment of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Katlyn GreenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.
Alexandru BuduDepartment of Neurosurgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMinimally invasive spine (MIS) surgery has evolved significantly during the past decades; however, it remains dependent on fluoroscopic imaging in many centres throughout the world. Substantial radiation exposure to the patient and surgeon is inevitable in these procedures. The aim of this study is to assess whether MIS surgery without neuro-navigation (NN) leads to excessive radiation exposure.

methodsWe retrospectively analysed all spinal instrumented cases performed at a Level 1 Trauma Centre during a 12-month period. Number of X-rays and radiation generated were measured for both open and MIS cases and compared based on type of procedure and number of levels fused. Dose area product (DAP) dose registered at the end of the case by the X-ray machine. Body Mass Index (BMI) was also analysed to assess the impact it has on X-ray tissue penetration.

resultsIn total, 141 instrumented thoracolumbar spinal cases were recorded, 57 MIS and 84 open, with a mean patient age of 55.8 and 57.5 years respectively. Mean BMI was 27.8 for the MIS group and 27.4 for the open group. For MIS cases, a mean of 192.3 X-rays were performed for each case, compared to 89.4 for open cases, while the dose calculated was 0.96 mGym2 for MIS, compared to 0.37 mGym2 for open.

conclusionMIS procedures without the use of NN carry a high risk of radiation exposure to the surgeon. Future research should focus on identifying barriers to the widespread adoption of NN.

Indexed as

minimally invasive spine surgeryneuro-navigationradiation dose reductionrobotic spine surgerysurgeon’s experience

Identifiers

PMID41536369
PMCPMC12799266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.