ReviewCureus2025
Comparative Effects of Hormone Replacement Therapy and Exercise on Bone Health in Postmenopausal Women: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postmenopausal women are at increased risk of bone loss and fractures. This review compares hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and weight-bearing exercise in their ability to preserve bone mineral density (BMD), a key factor in osteoporosis prevention. A systematic review of HRT and weight-bearing exercise therapy in postmenopausal women was conducted from February 24, 2025, to April 5, 2025, across six electronic databases. A full-text screening was completed by two independent reviewers following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Six studies were included according to the inclusion criteria, such as publication date, study format, intervention type, primary outcome, and follow-up duration. Data was extracted using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA), and a risk-of-bias assessment was completed. Postmenopausal women may benefit from HRT, as there were greater improvements in BMD than exercise therapy alone and a decreased risk of fracture at sites such as the hip and vertebrae. Exercise interventions, particularly resistance-based or mixed-loading programs, also demonstrated improvements in BMD, although results varied depending on the type and intensity of exercise. Findings were varied and not uniformly superior to either intervention alone. There is also limited evidence evaluating the possible additive benefits of combined therapy. Additionally, discontinuing HRT after beginning it resulted in a decline in BMD, suggesting discontinuation is non-neutral. Both HRT and weight-bearing exercise therapy were associated with improvements in BMD in postmenopausal women, with HRT resulting in greater increases than exercise alone. Exercise remains an important non-pharmacologic strategy, and combination therapy may provide an additive benefit, particularly at high-risk fracture sites such as the lumbar spine and hip, although further research is needed to clarify these effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.