ArticleAnnotation of real-world data for artificial intelligence systems : 9th international workshop, ARDUOUS 2025, Bologna Italy, October 25-26, 2025, proceedings. International Workshop on Annotation of Real-World Data for Artificial Intell...2026
Towards Practical, Best Practice Video Annotation to Support Human Activity Recognition.
Article in Annotation of real-world data for artificial intelligence systems : 9th international workshop, ARDUOUS 2025, Bologna Italy, October 25-26, 2025, proceedings. International Workshop on Annotation of Real-World Data for Artificial Intell..., 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- DaRA Dataset: Combining Wearable Sensors, Location Tracking, and Process Knowledge for Enhanced Human Activity and Human Context Recognition in Warehousing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Physical Activity Assessment Using Wearable Sensors (PAAWS) Dataset: Labeled Laboratory and Free-living Accelerometer Data.Proceedings of the ACM on interactive, mobile, wearable and ubiquitous technologies · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Researchers need ground-truth activity annotations to train and evaluate wearable-sensor-based activity recognition models. Often-times, researchers establish ground truth by annotating the video recorded while someone engages in activity wearing sensors. The "gold-standard" video annotation practice requires two trained annotators independently annotating the same footage with a third domain expert resolving disagreements. Such annotation is laborious, and so widely-used datasets have often been annotated using only a single annotator per video. Because the research community is moving towards collecting data of more complex behaviors from free-living people 24/7 and annotating more granular, fleeting activities, the annotation task grows even more challenging; the single-annotator approach may yield inaccuracies. We investigated a "silver-standard" approach: rather than using two independent annotation passes, a second annotator
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.