ReviewOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2026
Variable Return-to-Sport Rates Despite Improved Shoulder Function and Outcomes Scores After Primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in Active Patients: A Systematic Review.
Review in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Publicly available online activity restrictions after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty demonstrate marked variability.Journal of shoulder and elbow arthroplasty · 2026Article
- Refining Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: From Implant Design to Patient-Specific Strategy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The surgical indications for reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have continued to expand as it continues to be effective in restoring functionality in older, less active populations. The effect of RSA on return to sport (RTS) in the athletic population has been sparsely studied. Purpose: To systematically review the RTS rate after primary RSA. Study Design: Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science online databases was conducted and included articles published from database inception until December 22, 2024. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies reporting on RTS after primary RSA. Rates of RTS or activity were collected. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and range of motion (ROM) data were collected when available. Delta values, the change from preoperative to postoperative values, were calculated for each PROM and ROM when available. Study quality was assessed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria. Results: Overall, 15 studies reporting on a total of 937 patients (954 shoulders) were included in this review. Mean patient age was 72.7 years (range, 68.0-76.5 years), and 58.1% were female. Mean follow-up was 40.5 months (range, 31.6-57.6 months). The RTS for the studies ranged from 48% to 100%. Swimming (n = 188 athletes) was the most reported sport, followed by golf (n = 151 athletes). Sport-specific RTS rates ranged from 50% to 100% for golf and 64% to 67% for swimming. Patients returned to a higher level of performance 11% to 74% of the time. Postoperative delta values ranged from -7 to -2.1 for the visual analog scale for pain (VAS Pain) during sport, -6.1 to -3 for VAS Pain, 24.4 to 59 for the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and 3.8 to 8 for the Simple Shoulder Test. The mean MINORS score of the included studies was 16.8 (range, 16-19) for comparative studies and 10.0 (range, 9-11) for noncomparative studies. Conclusion: Our study showed that primary RSA allows for variable rates of RTS ranging from 48% to 100%, with 50% to 100% of patients returning to golf and 64% to 67% returning to swimming. Overall, patients reported improved postoperative outcomes scores and range of motion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.