ArticleActa medica Philippina2025
Utility of Performing Routine Screening Tests of Infections in the Clinical Management of Preterm Labor in a Tertiary Hospital in the Philippines.
Article in Acta medica Philippina, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Preterm birth is a major cause of complications leading to death of children under 5 years old. Infections are important to be identified because antimicrobial treatment may prevent or delay progression to preterm delivery. This study determined if routine screening tests of infections are useful in the clinical management of preterm labor. Methods: A cross-sectional (descriptive) study was done involving 417 pregnant patients who had preterm labor and was subsequently admitted from 2015 to 2019 at a tertiary hospital in the Philippines, using review of past medical records, inpatient charts, and admission charts. Results: Majority of the patients delivered at less than 34 weeks, most of the culture results turned out negative, and urine tests were more commonly employed as screening tests for preterm labor. The endocervical and rectovaginal swab studies had no significant growths. Asymptomatic bacteriuria was diagnosed in 1 out of 10 patients and they were subsequently started on antibiotic treatment. Majority of the patients who were given antibiotics delivered within 48 hours from admission. Conclusion: The routine use of cultures in the assessment of preterm labor is costly and is unlikely to be helpful in the clinical management of patients in preterm labor.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.