ReviewJSES reviews, reports, and techniques2026
Baseplate fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: influence of intraoperative guidance on postoperative outcomes.
Review in JSES reviews, reports, and techniques, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Posterior shoulder instability : Epidemiology, examination, and diagnostics].Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, precise positioning of the glenoid baseplate is essential for optimizing biomechanics and implant longevity. This narrative review introduces modern guidance modalities (patient-specific instrumentation, computer-assisted navigation, and augmented reality intraoperative navigation) and compares available literature on implant alignment accuracy, patient-reported outcomes, and complication rates. Although patient-specific instrumentation and computer-assisted navigation consistently improve alignment with preoperative plans and reduce errors in guide pin and screw placement, short-term measures of strength, mobility, and patient-reported outcomes are similar to those achieved with conventional freehand methods. However, guided approaches demonstrate a reduction in the risk of complications in the short term. This suggests that the primary clinical advantage of these modern techniques is reducing complications and potentially improving long-term implant outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.